Well, it has been to so long since I have last sat down to write about my learning. I do not like to go so long without an update, but I think it will actually be of benefit to me because I have a better grasp on what I have been learning. So here it goes. . .
Our inquiries are well underway at this point and my learning has taken a new and different direction than I was anticipating. In our group’s inquiry we decided to focus on when violence actually erupted with Tiananmen Square. So naturally I was not expecting that our inquiry would have grown into what it is now. Previous to this inquiry I knew next to nothing about the Tiananmen Square Protests of 1989, let alone Chinese history, politics, culture, etc. It has been a challenge to continue ahead in our inquires and maintain direction without getting too overloaded with other information. However, as a group I think that we are learning how to keep our direction and go off the track a bit in order to understand this event in many different ways with the proper foundations to support our learning.
I am also learning a lot about deciphering through resources that I am finding to get to the story from various perspectives and voices and not just a singular angle. I did not realize the importance of this until we started the inquires. However, if I did not do this there would be a lot of learning and real understanding missed out on. Also, the inquiry reports that we produce would all be very biased as we are not only selecting what we are reporting on, but also how the story is being portrayed. That can be very dangerous.
As I write the reports and the inquiries I am learning a lot about simple things such as the set up of the report. To make a more professional paper I need to pay attention to the small details, such as name, date, report number, bibliographical citation, so that the people reading have a better understanding and it will make it easier to work with the report in the future. Previous to this class I had never heard of an annotated bibliography and therefore I did not know how to create one or work with one. However, I think I am slowly catching on to this. I also see the importance of it. We are not doing all of this work in vain. It has a purpose, and that purpose is becoming clearer. Many other students, in their upper years, do not know how to create or work with an annotated bibliography. So, although right now all of this work seems like a waste of time or a hassle, I know that it will be to my benefit in the years to come.
Going into this inquiry I assumed that there was a universal definition and understanding of what democracy is. However, I was quite wrong. The idea of what democracy is may be similar amongst countries and people. However, the ways in which it is interpreted, lived out and, in this case, fought for all differ greatly. Many of the Chinese protesters involved in Tiananmen Square were not fighting so that they could vote and have more of a voice in the way their country was being run. They wanted more integrity within their current government. They were not asking for age old Chinese traditions to be rid of. Instead, they simply wanted leaders to be more for the people and lead China forward in all areas. I think, so far anyways, that this has been my biggest and most important learning curve in the inquiry because I can assume that I know what people are talking about, however, until I switch frames I will not be able to understand a different point of view.
I already mentioned this briefly, but I am learning a lot about voices and conversations within different contexts and themes. This is true with the Tiananmen Square inquiry and also true in my Intercordia Prep class as I have been reading various texts about Ghana. I had no idea how biased and framed all writing is. People’s experiences, beliefs, backgrounds, etc really have a great affect on the way they talk about certain things. This is a good thing, but I have learned that I need to see what other voices are saying as well to create a conversation and gain a better understanding of different perspectives.
This past week I also attended the Food Inc. movie that was shown on campus. Most of the movie served as a real wakeup call for myself, and I think most people in the room. The film was obviously framed in a certain way. However, unlike many documentaries of this nature, it was not trying to get is to necessarily take side (although, we ultimately did). It was very blunt in the way it framed the food industry, but I think this was also needed. Food is a very crucial part of sustaining life and the food that most of us are eating on a regular base has a story to tell. That story will include the various places it came from, how it was created, who created it, how it was killed/harvested to be eaten, etc. There are many steps in the process of eating and getting food. No longer is it from the farmer to the plate. The process has grown to be something much more logistical and political in nature. I was aware of much of this, however, it is still disturbing. I get too caught up in placing the blame on the government and various corporations. However, the more that I have been thinking about it, the more I see this as problematic. I mean nothing will ever change unless I am willing to make personal choices that will create change. If enough of us change our corner of the world then maybe, just maybe, we would see a more significant change in a global way. It all comes back to watch of us demanding integrity within the government and our suppliers, but ultimately we have to be the change that we want to see.